Have You Bought Uncle Ben’s Rice? You May Be Getting Money Back!

unclebens

A proposed class action lawsuit has been filed in California claiming that Uncle Ben’s Rice is deceptively packaged. Plaintiffs Eric Lankenau-Ray, a California resident and Carmen Vargas, a New York resident, filed their class action lawsuit stating that Mars has been “intentionally packaging its Uncle Ben’s rice products (Rice Product/s) in box containers that contain up to 50% empty space.”

Both plaintiffs claim that they purchased the boxes of rice at a higher price believing they were premium rice with more product inside, only to open the box and discover that there was up to 50% empty space, or “slack-fill”.  According to the proposed class action lawsuit, the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) prohibits slack-fill of products.

The language of the FDCA says that products may be considered misbranded if the following condition is present: “A container that does not allow the consumer to fully view its contents shall be considered to be filled as to be misleading if it contains nonfunctional slack-fill. Slack-fill is the difference between the actual capacity of a container and the volume of product contained therein.”

The lawsuit claims that there’s no functional reason to have the additional space within the packaging.

The plaintiffs are seeking to represent a nationwide Class of consumers who purchased Uncle Ben’s rice that included non-functional slack-fill, as well as a New York and California subclass of such consumers. Hundreds of thousands of members are expected to make up the Class.

Have you purchased this? Read more here.


For the newest retail news in the United States, go here! Yes We News brings you the latest breaking news in the world of retail. Have a story? Share it here.

Yes We Coupon