Have You Bought Uncle Ben’s Rice? You May Be Getting Money Back!

unclebens

A proposed class action lawsuit has been filed in California claiming that Uncle Ben’s Rice is deceptively packaged. Plaintiffs Eric Lankenau-Ray, a California resident and Carmen Vargas, a New York resident, filed their class action lawsuit stating that Mars has been “intentionally packaging its Uncle Ben’s rice products (Rice Product/s) in box containers that contain up to 50% empty space.”

Both plaintiffs claim that they purchased the boxes of rice at a higher price believing they were premium rice with more product inside, only to open the box and discover that there was up to 50% empty space, or “slack-fill”.  According to the proposed class action lawsuit, the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) prohibits slack-fill of products.

The language of the FDCA says that products may be considered misbranded if the following condition is present: “A container that does not allow the consumer to fully view its contents shall be considered to be filled as to be misleading if it contains nonfunctional slack-fill. Slack-fill is the difference between the actual capacity of a container and the volume of product contained therein.”

The lawsuit claims that there’s no functional reason to have the additional space within the packaging.

The plaintiffs are seeking to represent a nationwide Class of consumers who purchased Uncle Ben’s rice that included non-functional slack-fill, as well as a New York and California subclass of such consumers. Hundreds of thousands of members are expected to make up the Class.

Have you purchased this? Read more here

.


For the newest retail news in the United States, go here! Yes We News brings you the latest breaking news in the world of retail. Have a story? Share it here.

Yes We Coupon